Social Psychology & Development and personality
Social psychology
(the study of how we think about, influence and relate to one
another)
Three
parts include:
·
Thinking
·
Influencing
·
Relating
Attribution Theory
- · The idea that we give casual explanation for someone’s behavior
- · We credit that behavior either to the situation or…
- · To the person’s disposition
- The tendency to underestimate the impact of a situation and overestimate the impact of personal disposition
Attitudes
- · A belief or feeling that predisposes one to respond in a particular way to something
Foot in the door phenomenon
- · The tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request
Door in face phenomenon
· The tendency for people who say no to a huge request, to comply with a smaller one
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
- · We do not like when we have either conflicting attitudes or when our attitudes do not match our actions.
- · When they clash, we will change our attitude to create balance
Social influence
- · Adjusting one’s behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard
Conditions that strengthen conformity
- · One is made to feel incompetent
- · The group is at least three people
- · The group has to be unanimous
- · One admires the group’s status
- · One had made no prior commitment
- · The person is observed
- Normative social influence
- · Influence resulting from a person’s desire to gain approval or avoid disappointment
- Informational social influence
- · Influence resulting from one’s willingness to accept other’s opinions about reality
- · Improved performance of tasks in the presence of others
- · Occurs with simple or well learned tasks
- · Not with tasks that are difficult or not yet mastered
·
There is an optimal level of arousal for the
best performance of any task:
·
Easy tasks- relatively high
·
Difficult tasks- low arousal
·
Other tasks- moderate level
- · The tendency for people in a group to exert less effort when pooling efforts toward a common goal than if they were individually accountable
Deindividuation
- · The loss of self- awareness and self- restraint occurring in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity
Group Polarization
- · The concept that a group’s attitude is one of extremes and rarely moderate
Group Think
- · The mode of thinking that occurs when the desire for harmony in a decision- making group overrides common sense
Self- Fulfilling prophecies
- · Occurs when one person’s belief about others leads one to act in ways that induce the others appears to confirm the belief
Social relations
- · An unjustifiable attitude towards a group of people
- · Usually involves stereotyped beliefs (a generalized belief about a group of people)
Social Inequalities
(A principle reason behind prejudice)
- · Ingroup: “us” people with whom one shares a common identity
- · Outgroup: “them” those perceived as different than one’s ingroup
- · Ingroup bias: the tendency to favor one’s own group
- · The theory that prejudice provides an outlet for anger by providing someone to blame
Aggression
- · Any physical or verbal behavior intended to hurt or destroy
Conflict
- · A perceived incompatibility of action, goals, or ideas
Attraction
- · Proximity
- · Reciprocal liking
- · Similarity
- · Liking through Association
- · Passionate love: an aroused state& intense positive adaption of another
- · Compassionate love: the deep affectionate attachment we feel for those with whom our lives are intertwined
- · Unselfish regard for the welfare of others
- · Kitty Genovese case




Pertaining to Conformity, there are various experiments of the 1900s to see how far humans are willing to go as they obey an authoritative figure (Milgram's Experiment). As well as, how likely people are to conform to group answers and why (Asche Experiment). These are great to watch and gain further knowledge on the subject of conformity.
ReplyDeleteThere are two experiments about Foot in the door phenomenon made by Freedman & Fraser that tested the proposition that once someone has agreed to a small request he is more likely to comply with a larger request. Previous studies had shown that external pressure can be used to increase compliance. The more pressure, the more compliance.
ReplyDeleteLooking within our own community at school, foot in the door is a very common. People might start asking for 25 cents but then it would lead to the a dollar and so on.